The rise of antisemitic rhetoric, vandalism, and violence in the United States has sparked concern, particularly on college campuses and in cities. However, New York Magazine’s Jonathan Chait argues that the issue is not as pronounced on the political Left as some may believe.
Chait’s perspective centers on the distinctions between the activist Left and the Democratic Party, emphasizing the responsible stance taken by institutional stewards within the Democratic Party against antisemitism. Yet, Chait’s argument extends to downplaying concerns about vocal elements within the Democratic Party itself.
For instance, Representative Rashida Tlaib’s statements have drawn criticism, but Chait contends that they do not meet the threshold of antisemitism. He cites Tlaib’s support for slogans like “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” arguing that it is not inherently antisemitic. However, critics point to the slogan’s implications and the discomfort it causes among certain communities.
Chait acknowledges Tlaib’s controversial statements but maintains that they do not qualify as antisemitic. He also downplays concerns about Representative Ilhan Omar, suggesting that the Democratic Party handled the situation appropriately by denouncing her comments.
However, critics argue that Omar’s history includes instances of invoking stereotypes and perpetuating dual-loyalty canards, contributing to a perception of antisemitism. The article emphasizes that while the American Right also faces an antisemitism problem, addressing the issue within the Left is crucial for responsible Democrats.
The piece concludes by warning that as long as the Left’s partisans downplay the problem of antisemitism within their ranks, the issue may persist and potentially worsen over time.
